RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00715
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 21 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The equipment malfunctioned before and during the walk portion of the test and pain medication may have increased his heart rate, which precluded him from obtaining an overall satisfactory rating on the contested FA.
Prior to the start of the test his heart rate monitor was giving multiple false readings. To remedy the situation, the FAC had him try several different monitors and even gave him a new one on the final lap of the 1-Mile Walk. After completing the cardio component the new monitor read 158 beats per minute (BPM); however, the FAC told the applicant that they would have to use the reading from the monitor he was previously wearing. This monitor read 171 BPM and prevented him from passing the cardio component of the contested FA.
The applicant submitted a personal statement and a Standard FM 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care, which indicates that he was taking medication, Meloxicam for a neck injury.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Staff Sergeant (E-5).
On 21 Nov 12, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an overall composite score of 74.13, which constituted an unsatisfactory assessment. The applicant was credited with the following component scores: Cardio (1-Mile Walk) 40/44.90, Abdominal Circumference 38.00/14.40 points, Push-ups Exempt, Sit-ups Exempt.
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows:
Date
Composite Score
Rating
27 Aug 13
72.80
Unsatisfactory
28 Feb 13
75.00
Satisfactory
*21 Nov 12
74.13
Unsatisfactory
15 May 12
76.30
Satisfactory
16 Feb 12
60.20
Unsatisfactory
*Contested FA
On 15 Nov 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support applicants medical claim.
______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removing the scores in AFFMS, stating the evidence provided by the applicant does not substantiate the claim. Specifically, the applicant did not provide evidence from his medical provider stating the medication elevated his heart rate or a letter from the FAC indicating the equipment malfunctioned.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. While the applicant has provided medical documentation indicating that he was on pain medication, he has not met his burden of proving the contested FA should be removed from his records. In this respect, we note the applicants submission does not contain sufficient documentation to include; a Medical Determinition Letter from his medical provider validating his medication caused an increased heart rate; support from his commander requesting the FA be invalidated; an AF Form 422 exempting him from the contested FA; or the Fitness Screening Questionnaire he was required to complete prior to participating in the assessment. Moreover, the applicants submission does not contain a letter from the FAC indicating the equipment was malfunctioning and may have given false heart rate readings. Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request. However, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.The application was timely filed.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00715 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Feb 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 26 Sep 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Dec 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05107
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05107 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 21 Sep 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant did not provide any evidence his 1.0 mile walk was improperly administered during the FA. The 21 Sep 2012 FA was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05064
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05064 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 5 Sep 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). When he completed his walk with the same monitor it read 170 BPM, which only gave him 21.7 points for the cardio portion, and, as a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05369
DPSIM states that the applicant provided a memorandum from the Director, Fitness and Sports Complex at Kadena Air Base, Japan which states her staff was aware of the manufacturers guidance that HR monitors can cause erratic readings and have previously separated walkers after crossing the finish line to keep their distance to avoid syncing with other HR monitors worn by other walkers. After he completed the cardio component of the FA, he had a 20 minute argument with three of the FACs and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03936
While the applicant renders a variety of arguments intended undermine the functioning of the heart rate monitors used during the contested FAs, the only real evidence he has provided in support of his assertions is a supporting statement from a colleague who says he made an independent measurement of the applicants heart rate after the end of the 5 May 13 FA. However, we do not find this statement or the applicants arguments sufficient to conclude that he is the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02274
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Jul 13 86.50 Satisfactory *26 Apr 13 74.13 Unsatisfactory 19 Sep 12 79.50 Satisfactory 26 Jun 12 60.70 Unsatisfactory 26 May 08 72.00 Marginal * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence; specifically witness statement to support injustice. IAW AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program (AFGM5) dated 3 Jan 13,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02521
Along with his personal statement, the applicant provided a memorandum from his medical provider that validates he had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. On that same memorandum, the applicants medical provider indicated he had a documented medical condition that precluded him/her from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test. IAW AFI 36-2905; Atch 1, Para 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03908
On 29 Nov 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicants request for relief on the basis that the applicant should not have completed the contested FAs once she became injured; additionally, the applicant did not provide a commanders invalidation memorandum invalidating contested FAs. For Regular Air Force and AGR, they will enter the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02331
On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Feb 14, applicant provided a memorandum in rebuttal of AFPC/DPSIM and FAAB memoranda. While we note an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05443
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05443 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 17 Dec 12, 15 Mar 13, and 12 Jun 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a Medical Determination letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01104
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 1 Jun 2012 Exempt Exempt *24 May 12 66.00 Unsatisfactory *2 Mar 12 67.88 Unsatisfactory 5 Jan 10 75.35 Good 3 Dec 08 76.85 Good* Contested FA On 6 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), due to a lack of supporting documentation from the applicants primary care manager and commander. ________________________________________________________________ AIR...